In a surprising turn of events, half of the HR department at a tech company was fired after a critical oversight was discovered in the recruitment process. A manager, who also served as the tech lead, shared his experience on Reddit, which quickly went viral, prompting widespread discussion among netizens.
The Incident: What Happened?
The manager revealed that he had been struggling to fill a single position on his team for over three months. Frustrated by the lack of suitable candidates, he decided to test the company's recruitment process himself. To do so, he created a new email address and sent in a modified version of his own CV, under a fake name. To his astonishment, his application was automatically rejected by the company’s faulty automated recruitment system.
Upon further investigation, it was found that the system had been incorrectly filtering out candidates who did not have experience with AngularJS — a JavaScript framework — while the team was actually searching for candidates with expertise in Angular, a completely different but similarly named framework. As a result, every CV that lacked AngularJS experience was automatically rejected, including candidates who had the necessary skills.
The Fallout
After realizing the root of the problem, the tech lead escalated the issue to upper management. The revelation was so significant that it led to the firing of half of the HR department. According to the manager, such an issue could have been easily fixed in minutes but had gone unnoticed for months due to HR’s oversight.
In his Reddit post, the manager expressed his disappointment with the HR team’s lack of attention to detail, stating, “HR didn’t even look at my CV. They kept telling me that the candidates didn’t pass the first screening process, which was false.” He added that HR had given misleading updates throughout the recruitment process, causing a major delay in hiring.
This incident highlighted the danger of relying too heavily on automated recruitment systems without proper oversight. The failure to accurately screen CVs for the right qualifications not only wasted the company's time but also drove away qualified candidates who could have been a perfect fit for the role.
The Internet Reacts
The Reddit post sparked a heated discussion among users, with many sharing their frustrations with similar experiences involving automated hiring systems. Some netizens criticized HR departments for relying too much on technology, while others highlighted how such mistakes can damage a company’s ability to attract top talent.
One user commented, “Automated systems are supposed to help, not hinder. If no one is reviewing what’s being rejected, then the system is completely useless.” Others were more critical of the HR department, labeling the team as “incompetent” for not manually reviewing the resumes before rejecting them.
Similar Incidents in Recruitment
This isn’t the first time issues with automated hiring systems have come to light. In recent years, there has been growing concern about the limitations and biases of these systems. Many companies use artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to screen resumes, but these tools are not infallible. According to research, automated systems can sometimes reject perfectly qualified candidates due to errors in keyword matching, outdated criteria, or poorly programmed filters.
In fact, a report by the Harvard Business Review found that more than 75% of resumes submitted to large corporations are never seen by human eyes because they are automatically filtered out by applicant tracking systems (ATS). These systems often prioritize certain keywords, leaving highly qualified individuals with slightly different qualifications overlooked.
Moreover, companies that rely on outdated or improperly programmed algorithms risk losing out on top talent, damaging their reputation in the industry.
Lessons Learned
This incident serves as a wake-up call for companies that rely heavily on automated recruitment tools. While technology can certainly improve efficiency, it is essential to regularly review and update these systems to ensure they are working as intended. Additionally, human oversight is crucial in the recruitment process to prevent the loss of potential hires due to technical errors or misinterpretations.
For HR departments, this case underscores the importance of staying actively involved in recruitment rather than placing too much trust in automation. Human intuition and attention to detail remain vital aspects of the hiring process, and HR professionals must ensure that they are not replaced entirely by machines.
Lastly, this event brings to light the broader conversation around the balance between technology and human input in modern hiring processes. As companies continue to digitize their recruitment strategies, it is crucial to find a middle ground where technology supports human decision-making rather than replacing it entirely.
For companies using automated hiring tools, this case highlights the potential pitfalls of relying too heavily on AI without adequate human oversight. Regular system checks, clear communication with hiring managers, and a hands-on approach can ensure that the best candidates aren’t lost in a sea of miscommunication.
Shrishty Sharma
Manager HR/ Author
Asiatic International Corp
Shrishty@Flying-Crews.com
Shrishty@Air-aviator.com
https://www.flying-crews.com
LinkedIn :
https://shorturl.at/U5G6E
Link tree: https://linktr.ee/Shrishty_HRM_Flying_Crews
Vcard:
https://shrishtysharma.vcardinfo.com
Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/flyingcrewhrm
YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/aerosoftcorp